LiveBinders helps to gather a variety of online resources in one place. Engage students easily and know if your students are watching the videos. H5P - A free and open-source content collaboration framework. Easy for everyone to create, share, and reuse interactive HTML5 content. Draw, orbit, push-pull: make anything you can imagine. Google Jamboard - Jamboard is a digital whiteboard that lets you collaborate in real time using a web browser or mobile app.
Padlet - Padlet is a free, online tool that is best described as an online notice board. Padlet can be used by students and teachers to post notes on a common page. The notes posted by teachers and students can contain links, videos, images, and document files. Do not forget that IUP offers many supported applications that can be used similarly to Web 2.
These tools are not often known by the IUP community. One popular tool used by many is Zoom, our video conference product. Zoom can be used for meeting online or for virtual office hours.
There is also Turnitin, with the integration in Brightspace. Zoom - Zoom is IUP's supported video conferencing service. Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, group messaging, and more on an easy-to-use platform.
Zoom can expand courses with video communications, increasing student participation and engagement. But that has been my point all along for the last 5 years of my career. I have been thinking and writing about ' Learning 2. This is the argument that there has been a paradigm shift in the way students learn - from 1. One of the most valuable assets a 21st Century learner has is their personal learning network PLN.
This new learning is strategy, not support. The focus is shifting from the workshop to the workplace, from courses to conversations, from classrooms to learning environments, and from events to on-going processes. Informal Learning 2. Published in Chief Learning Officer, August Corporate approaches to learning have to change, as well. Until the shift from industrial to network dominance, corporations could compensate for crummy learning by hiring experienced people and managing ingenious command-and-control structures.
Increasing customer loyalty though learning. Performance-metrics driven e- learning design - captures critical performance areas and provides small e- learning topics to support learning 2. Social and collaborative learning - Web 2. As I have shared in my workshops and consulting work, LMSs are alive and kicking, but they are morphing into different forms and shapes. What makes web 2. Obama's inaguration had millions of people with each one a unique story to tell.
Although the use of Web 2. Saba's new offering is a leaning towards Web 2. I think of Learning 2. Focusing on that first aspect of Learning 2.
My Measures: Not perhaps the most useful app for helping you design learning , but when it comes to building an Ikea book case that has the wrong size doors, it was a dream. Perhaps only social learning netwoks. Maybe there is special code approved by the really smart people of Blackboard that prevents homies on friendster from actually learning anything. I missed this, but apparently friendster has patented social netwoks.
So then what has Blackboard patented? So, if you are on friendster chillin' with yo homies and they IM you somthing that you didn't previously know, who owes who the money?
This should be shocking enough to force some sort of change in e- Learning design, but it hasn't. Schlenker goes on to tie elearning 2. Now can the use of " learning 2.
It has 23 Tasks over a 9 week period that helped them get you up to speed on what Web 2. I also somehow ran across Matt's Learning 2. This month's Big Question on the Learning Circuits Blog asks 'What new skills and knowledge are required for learning professionals? I suspect a lot of the X 2. Instantiating Learning for X, we also notice the same shades. Where things get skewed is the tendency to look at learning 2. This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies.
If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use. Sign Up for our Newsletter Sign Up.
I hope the rest of the article is better than that. Join me if you are interested. It's OK but this Oehlert guy who wrote it, kinda sketchy. Input your email to sign up, or if you already have an account, log in here! Log In. Remember me I forgot my password. Sign Up. Enter your email address to reset your password. Nevermind, I remember my password. Personalized for you. Subscribe to the following eLearning Learning newsletters:. Resources: Webinars, eBooks, White Papers.
Personalize my articles. Agree to Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. We request your consent to allow us to send you newsletters and resources webinars, eBooks, white papers to the email address you have provided.
More Details. If you do provide consent, you may change your mind and unsubscribe at any time. If you would like to unsubscribe or have any questions, you can click on the unsubscribe links in our messages or contact us using the information below. For information about how we use information you provide to us, please read our Privacy Policy. For Canadian Residents: By providing your consent below, you are expressly agreeing that we may email you under Canada's Anti-Spam Law.
For more information on this law, you may visit the Government of Canada's site. For more information on this regulation, you may visit the European Union's site.
Additional details. Contact Information: Aggregage info aggregage. You know about us, now we want to get to know you! Moving on. What is eLearning 2. Web 2. Now onto eLearning 2. There are a few articles on this, probably the two most commonly cited up until this article are: E-Learning 2. Oh, and also part of the what makes understanding eLearning 2.
I would, via a gross generalization, put these camps down as:. Again, this article is primarily aimed at people coming from the eLearning world. So, my concept of eLearning 2. This trend exists independent of the whole discussion of Web 2. In reality it is what is driving a lot of the discussions around Blended Learning and Rapid eLearning.
If you did the Action Items above, you likely had the same reaction when you created your blog. That was incredibly easy! Wow, this software as services thing really works. These are small modules that are provided by completely separate companies which are also very easy to set up and plug right into my Blog.
I created a poll and put it right in my blog. Wow, this small software component stuff really works. Content Creation in eLearning 2. Again, did you look at Writely? Action Item : Go find out what Portal software you have in your company. It has CMS built in. Right now this is the big advantage of LCMS solutions, but you can actually create an add-on for the CMS solutions to track this today.
Okay, so first content creation trend is the insanely easily creation of reference materials. Or I can also drop in a brief demonstration or simulation authored in Captivate. Now, the number of components that I can drop-in is increasing dramatically think about Blogger Add-ons.
See my previous article to get some ideas about different interactive elements that I can drop in. Well you do and its pretty much the same. But using add-ins instead of what the authoring tool provides allows me to choose best of breed. I can use what Lectora gives me or I can choose a different add-in. And, that add-in can allow my students to interact with the content and each other! Wait, what was that? Yep, interaction with your students within your content.
For example, a few years ago for one of our clients we created a pretty cool little feature. The client would be bringing a new customer up on their software and would need to train five people how to operate and run the software.
These learners would go through online courseware for about 6 hours that would teach them about the software and test them using simulations. At the end, they would be able to edit their list and then it was sent to the instructor. Once all five people were done with the courseware, the instructor would schedule a WebEx and go through the questions. It really worked well. But, of course, we had to build that capability. Now I can drop it into my course for free.
I could also drop in other opportunities to interact with the content that would get back to the instructor and also to share thoughts and comments with other learners. And, by adding in the ability for students to interact with our content, we are suddenly opening a lot of possibilities.
Remember that this also means that I can very easily set up blended learning opportunities that have significant follow-up components that include active participation by learners and other related people. For example, in retail, when we have an intervention aimed at store managers, we will include the district managers as coaches and require that the store managers create action plans that are reviewed and commented on by district managers.
But, I am saying that eLearning 2. The tools to do this are really here today and the barriers to using them are dropping rapidly. I do believe the next few years are going to be times of incredible experimentation with many-to-many communication approaches as part of learning initiatives. Content Access in eLearning 2.
As we lower the barrier to content creation, look to create smaller objects, have students create content, have SMEs create content, we are going to have an explosion of content. We need this content to be searchable. Search is a slam dunk. In fact, Action Item: go find out what search you have in your company. I know as a means of fostering community research, its great. Again — if you have comments, questions, thoughts, ideas, I welcome them.
I like this trend. As an educator, I really do. But just for perspective, I'm in a situation right now where I'm creating elearning for a corporation that is not at all interested in "making more work" for its managers by asking them to create bits of reference material.
The entire appeal of elearning for them is not that employees can "waste time" by communicating with one another using "fancy web tools" that they'd be forced to track and monitor according to Sarbanes-Oxley, but that revenue and productivity is increased by making training entirely self-paced - no contact necessary. I don't know anything that's going to change the view of this company except the long slow process of age and turnover, and I'm sure I'm not the only weeping instructional technologist out there facing this.
And speaking of weeping, you mentioned tagging. I'm in the process of implementing an LCMS at this company and have set up the most minimum of metadata schemes that I thought would work, and it's a nightmare.
Nobody understands how to tag consistently - despite guidelines - or wants to - and it takes minutes and screens on end before the tiniest object is tagged and you can actually work with the thing. I can't wait for more mature automatic tagging routines to be developed, though I can't tell from here what those would look like or how they would work. It's like an article of faith - I'm praying for better tagging and believe that it must eventually be developed.
I enjoyed your article. Mix, Thanks for the comments. I understand what you are saying about the limitations we face when you try to suggest solutions that don't fix inside the box of the expected form of the deliverables. On Friday, at a presentation, we were discussing exactly that issue and that the barrier is both management and learners and their ability to be successful with something that's different.
I've been talking with lots of folks trying to collect the patterns they use and the related success stories to be able to combat some of this, but I think this is going to be tough in a lot of corporate environments for a while.
Hi - Great eLearning 2. I am the manager of an Adobe Captivate Users Group in Seattle and would like to invite you to give a mins remote presentation via Adobe Connect of 'What is eLearning 2.
Would you be interested? Our group would be really interested. My own "view" of e-Learning 2. You can see more about my thoughts on the same at my blog.
Nice article, and I like the way you step people through the 'aha' moments that lead them to see that e-learning 2. Great article! We are using web 2. So in a sense, supporting your arguments, we don't really need authoring software anymore. Even better, most of the stuff we use is absolutely free!
0コメント